Skip to main content
· 12/4/2015

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Paul Arthur Silich

Citations

  • 872 N.W.2d 181
  • 2015 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 97
  • 2015 WL 7890032

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Silich’s omissions and poor communication with his clients necessitated three additional court hearings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waterman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.