Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Moonen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to respond to Board inquiries is a violation of DR 1-102(A)(5)-(6)
• recognizing failure to respond to board’s discovery requests requires court to consider all the matters stated in the requests as admitted
• recognizing this sanction is consistent with the sanctions allowed under Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 1.517(2)(6 )(1)
• finding that an attorney “who took fees without accounting for his time” violated DR 9-102(B)
• holding that “[h]arm to others” is an aggravating factor
• imposing eighteen-month suspension for neglect of probate matters and deliberately misleading or negligently failing to disclose information to the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).