Skip to main content
· 8/6/2010

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Lickiss

Citations

  • 786 N.W.2d 860
  • 2010 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 87
  • 2010 WL 3087455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the attorney’s four-month temporary suspension for noncooperation was adequate discipline for a violation of rule 32:8.1(b)
  • concluding that attorney’s dilatory handling of an estate, including failure to file required reports and cure numerous delinquencies, “required otherwise unnecessary administrative oversight by the clerk of court and judicial officers,” resulting in a violation of rule 32:8.4(d)
  • holding the attorney’s failure to cure multiple delinquencies in multiple cases resulted in a rule 32:1.3 violation
  • holding the attorney's failure to cure multiple delinquencies in multiple cases resulted in a rule 32:1.3 violation
  • finding the attorney’s four-month temporary suspension for noncooperation was adequate discipline for a violation of the disclosure requirements in rule 32:8.1
  • “Taking probate fees without prior approval by the court violates rule 32:1.5(a) . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.