Skip to main content
· 4/3/2015

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John E. Cepican

Citations

  • 861 N.W.2d 841
  • 2015 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 35
  • 2015 WL 1510639

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding respondent was precluded from introducing witnesses and evidence as a sanction for failing to answer the complaint or to provide discovery responses
  • noting the “charges must be known to the attorney before the hearing begins[,] [as] [t]he notice requirement is a basic component of procedural due process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cady, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.