Skip to main content
· 10/18/2013

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James A. Clarity III

Citations

  • 838 N.W.2d 648
  • 2013 WL 5658617
  • 2013 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “use of the actuarial tables is presumptively correct unless it is shown that such use is ‘unrealistic and unreasonable’ ”
  • use of tables would be “unrealistic and unreasonable” in valuing an income stream, when the projected income stream is expected to be exhausted prior to the expiration of the income term being valued
  • income stream was expected to be exhausted before expiration of the income term
  • income stream was expected to be exhausted before expiration of the income term

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waterman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.