Skip to main content
· 5/14/2010

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Hauser

Citations

  • 782 N.W.2d 147
  • 2010 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 41
  • 2010 WL 1926527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that to the extent the attorney acknowledged his alcoholism and takes steps to address the problem, the court will consider these acts in fashioning an appropriate sanction
  • holding attorney violated rule 32:1.3 when he neglected client’s dissolution of marriage proceeding by failing to make filings and by failing to appear at the scheduled trial
  • providing that a finding of incompetence requires a showing the attorney lacked the necessary legal knowledge and skill to complete the tasks or had not made a competent analysis of the problem
  • finding the attorney violated rule 32:1.3 by failing to make filings and not appearing at the scheduled trial
  • noting, to the extent attorney acknowledged his alcoholism and has taken steps to address the problem, the court considers these acts in fashioning an appropriate sanction
  • finding a violation of this rule when an attorney claimed he regularly maintained client trust account ledgers, but was unable to produce any ledger for the client in question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiggins, Ternus, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.