Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Blake D. Lubinus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a violation of chapter 45 constitutes a violation of rule 32:1.15(f)
• noting that lack of disciplinary record is a mitigating factor
• noting that lack of disciplinary record is a mitigating factor
• noting that lack of disciplinary record is a mitigating factor
• levying a thirty-day suspension on an attorney who failed to deposit advance fees into the trust account, prematurely withdrew fees, failed to keep adequate records, neglected to perform monthly reconciliations, and did not notify clients of withdrawals from the account
• “Stipulations of fact are controlling, but stipulations as to violations and appropriate sanctions do not bind us.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).