Iowa State Bank & Trust Co. v. Michel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that orders awarding attorney-fees after the filing of a notice of appeal must be separately appealed
• recognizing that “the filing of a notice of appeal generally deprives the district court of jurisdiction” other than over collateral matters such as awarding attorney fees
• recognizing that “the filing of a notice of appeal generally deprives the district court of jurisdiction” other than over collateral matters such as awarding 28 attorney fees
• explaining that the district court retains jurisdiction to examine a request for attorney fees after the filing of a notice of appeal
• noting rulings filed after the notice of appeal on collateral issues must be separately appealed to be reviewed
• “ ‘[CJourts of equity are bound by statutes and follow the law in [the] absence of fraud or mistake.’ ” (quoting Mensch v. Netty, 408 N.W.2d 383, 386 (Iowa 1987))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).