Iowa Electric Light & Power Co. v. Wendling Quarries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a common carrier must charge its tariff rates and any agreement to the contrary is unlawful and void
• observing argument that utility undercharges, whether intentional or unintentional, “would be to grant a preferential rebate to a customer in violation of [the] statutory mandate of nondiscriminatory rates”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).