Iowa Central Railway Co. v. Bacon
Citations
- 236 U.S. 305
- 35 S. Ct. 357
- 59 L. Ed. 591
- 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1762
Syllabus
<p>If the suit be one of which the Circuit Court can rightfully take jurisdiction, the state court loses jurisdiction on the filing of the petition and bond, and subsequent proceedings in that court are void; but if on the face of the record, including the petition for removal, it does not appear that the suit is removable, the state court is not bound to surrender its jurisdiction and may proceed as if no application for removal had been made. Traction Co. v. Mining Co., 196 U. S. 239.</p> <p>Although the petition may allege that plaintiff sustained damages in excess of two thousand dollars, if the prayer for recovery is for less than that sum, the jurisdictional amount is not involved, and the filing of a petition and bond does not effect a removal of the case.</p> <p>Although the Federal court may have made'orders continuing a case in which a petition and bond had been filed, and even dismissed it for want of prosecution, if the question of its authority had never been presented to or decided by it, the state court is not bound to respect such orders as conclusive of the question of jurisdiction; and so held in a case which on the face of the record was not removable as the amount claimed was less than $2,000, although the damages were stated in the petition as having exceeded that sum. Chesapeake & Ohio By. v. McCabe, 213 U. S. 207, distinguished.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that when jurisdictional amount was $2,000 and plaintiff’s damages were $10,-000, but he requested only $1,990, defendant could not remove
- stating that when a state case is removed to federal court, “the state court loses jurisdiction to proceed further, and all subsequent proceedings therein are void”
- state pleading for less than jurisdictional amount approved where “[t]he state court had authority to determine the effect of the prayer to the petition and it decided that, under the petition, no more than the amount prayed for could be recovered in the action”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Day
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.