Iosa v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s statement identifying “serious concerns” with the plaintiff’s work performance reflected “an opinion by [the defendant] about the adequacy of [the plaintiff’s] work”
• “The statement that there were ‘serious concerns’ about Plaintiff’s performance is an opinion by McQuay about the adequacy of Plaintiff’s work[,]” and “cannot as a matter of law be defamatory.”
• “The statement that there were ‘serious concerns’ about Plaintiff’s performance is an opinion by McQuay about the adequacy of Plaintiff’s work[,]” and “cannot as a matter of law be defamatory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).