Skip to main content
· 3/16/1988

Iorfida v. Mary Robert Realty Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 539 A.2d 383
  • 372 Pa. Super. 170
  • 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an affirmative defense does not need to be pled by name as long as the answer is “susceptible of the inference” that the facts alleged, if true, establish the defense
  • finding that a single paragraph of defendant’s new matter sufficiently raised abandonment as an affirmative defense
  • finding that a single paragraph of defendant’s new matter sufficiently raised abandonment as an affirmative defense
  • finding that a single paragraph of defendant’s new matter sufficiently raised abandonment as an affirmative defense
  • in context of easement actions abandonment is an affirmative defense which must be pleaded
  • in context of easement actions abandonment is an affirmative defense which must be pleaded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, McEwen, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.