Ioannis Chlomos A/K/A John Hlomos v. U. S. Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating removal order where, “as a practical matter,” two continuances were insufficient to obtain counsel and no dilatory tactics were evident
• \A telephone call by the hearing officer or the government trial attorney would have revealed the fact that a lawyer had entered his appearance for Chlomos.\
• “A telephone call by the hearing officer or the government trial attorney would have revealed the fact that a lawyer had entered his appearance for Chlomos.”
• “We do not condone unnecessary delay or dilatory tactics through the ruse of counsel’s unavailability.”
• where petitioner resided, obtained counsel and initially appeared before immigration court in New Jersey, agency’s decision to hold deportation hearings in Florida violated right to counsel
• “We disapprove of an administrative agency scheduling a hearing for a person who it knows is represented by counsel without giving reasonable notice to the lawyer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).