IO Experience Design LLC v. C & A Mktg. Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the federal issues had been adjudicated by the state court and that the remaining issues would not give rise to any further federal question
• holding that the federal issues had been adjudicated by the state court and that the remaining issues would not give rise to any further federal question
• recognizing that constraints in Article III of U.S. Constitution do not apply to state 6 courts and therefore state courts are not bound by federal case-or-controversy or justiciability rules
• recognizing that state courts “render binding judicial decisions that rest on their own interpretations of federal law”
• holding that state courts may render decisions based on their own interpretations of federal law unless the statute provides for exclusive federal jurisdiction
• holding that it was the ―right‖ of Arizona state courts to take ―no account of federal standing rules‖ in state court, even on a matter interpreting federal law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).