Invitrogen Corp. v. PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS, HARVARD

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the Board “may not rely on the inventor’s own declaration to establish facts regarding [an actual reduction to practice]”
• suggesting that the plaintiff may not raise a new reduction-to-practice date that was not presented to the Board

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).