Skip to main content
· 7/1/1977

Investors, Inc. v. Berry

Citations

  • 292 N.C. 729

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a landowner has a duty to prevent injurious substances from escaping from its premises and damaging the property of another
  • holding that a landowner has a duty to prevent injurious substances from escaping from its premises and damaging the property of another
  • holding that an injunction will not be awarded where “the plaintiff can be adequately compensated in damages,” where “the injury to the defendant is greater than the benefit to the plaintiff,” or where the injunction would result in a “serious detriment to the public.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.