INVESTMENT PROPERTIES CO., INC. v. Watson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where plaintiff sought either specific performance or damages, an award of monetary damages in addition to an award of specific performance was an impermissible double recovery
• finding that where plaintiff sought either specific performance or damages, an award of monetary damages in addition to an award of specific performance was an impermissible double recovery
• finding that where plaintiff sought either specific performance or damages, an award of monetary damages in addition to an award of specific performance was an impermissible double recovery
• explaining that, when there was nothing in the record to suggest that a party ever consented to trying additional issues or to allowing an amendment to the pleadings, courts must only determine whether the additional issues were tried by implication
• explaining that, when there was nothing in the record to suggest that a party ever consented to trying additional issues or to allowing an amendment to the pleadings, courts must only determine whether the additional issues were tried by implication
• “a party does not impliedly consent to the trial of a new issue when the evidence that allegedly raised the new issue is also relevant to an issue made by the pleadings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).