Skip to main content
· 5/20/1986

Investment Company Institute v. C.T. Conover, Comptroller of the Currency

Citations

  • 790 F.2d 925
  • 252 U.S. App. D.C. 364
  • 7 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1566
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25018

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Supreme Court's \declination to defer to the Comptroller\ in Camp was \occasioned ... by the Comptroller's complete silence as to the meaning of the governing statute\
  • recognizing implications for banking and securities industries in considering action for declaratory and injunctive relief challenging Comptroller's decision that Citibank's marketing of individual retirement accounts did not violate Glass-Steagall Act
  • noting that the Supreme Court’s “declination to defer to the Comptroller” in Camp was “occasioned ... by the Comptroller’s complete silence as to the meaning of the governing statute”
  • recognizing implications for banking and securities industries in considering action for declaratory and injunctive relief challenging Comptroller’s decision that Citibank’s marketing of individual retirement accounts did not violate Glass-Steagall Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scalia, Starr, McGowan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.