Invest Almaz v. Temple-Inland Forest Products Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The magistrate judge, following the majority of jurisdictions recognizing this tort, concluded that Invest Almaz had to prove that Temple-Inland had actual knowledge that Pathex was breaching a duty to Invest Almaz.”
• approving jury instruction under predicted New Hampshire law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).