Skip to main content
· 10/1/1998

Invamed, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.

Citations

  • 22 F. Supp. 2d 210
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15520
  • 1998 WL 682306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) encourages the responsive pleader to file a motion to dismiss before pleading, nothing in the rule prohibits the filing of a motion to dismiss with an answer.”
  • “Although Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) encourages the responsive pleader to file a motion to dismiss before pleading, nothing in the rule prohibits the filing of a motion to dismiss with an answer.”
  • “The complaint fails to support the existence of conspiracy as it presents no facts that might establish any participation by [parent companies] save including them within the term ‘defendants.’- ... [Plaintiff] has not alleged that the [parent companies] ‘acted’ in any way.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.