Skip to main content
· 6/28/2000

Intrastate Piping & Controls, Inc. v. Robert-James Sales, Inc.

Citations

  • 733 N.E.2d 718
  • 315 Ill. App. 3d 248
  • 248 Ill. Dec. 43
  • 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 177
  • 2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “Illinois courts have recognized and enforced exclusive remedy provisions, even without the word ‘exclusive,’ when the contract as a whole warrants such a construction.”
  • holding that “Illinois courts have recognized and enforced exclusive remedy provi- sions, even without the word ‘exclusive,’ when the contract as a whole warrants such a construction.”
  • emphasizing that sophisticated businesses are capable of protecting their own interests and allocating risks in a negotiation process
  • emphasizing that sophisticated businesses are capable of protecting their own interests and allocating risks in a negotiation process
  • distinguishing cases where warrantor unreasonably delayed repair or replacement or refused it at all, court found warranty had not failed of its essential purpose where defendant replaced defective parts free of charge
  • “Illinois courts have recognized and enforced exclusive remedy provisions, even without the word ‘exclusive,’ when the contract as a whole warrants such a construction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolfson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.