· 3/7/2006
Intransit, Inc. v. Excel North American Road Transport, Inc.
Citations
- 426 F. Supp. 2d 1136
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12617
- 2006 WL 572125
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that an action based on a contract between a broker and a carrier was “sufficiently removed from a shipper or some other party who has rights” to sue a carrier under a bill of lading
- broker’s claims “[were] for direct contractual indemnity and not from an assignment of rights by the shipper”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hogan, Cooney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.