Skip to main content
· 3/7/2006

Intransit, Inc. v. Excel North American Road Transport, Inc.

Citations

  • 426 F. Supp. 2d 1136
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12617
  • 2006 WL 572125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that an action based on a contract between a broker and a carrier was “sufficiently removed from a shipper or some other party who has rights” to sue a carrier under a bill of lading
  • broker’s claims “[were] for direct contractual indemnity and not from an assignment of rights by the shipper”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hogan, Cooney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.