IntraComm, Inc. v. Bajaj

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 541.708 creates an alternative method for satisfying the primary duty test
• ruling that a clause providing that either party “shall be free” to pursue its rights in a specified court did not preclude jurisdiction or 2 Generally, in resolving a motion pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) or Rule 12(c
• ruling that a clause providing that either party “shall be free” to pursue its rights in a specified court did not preclude jurisdiction or 2 Generally, in resolving a motion pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) or Rule 12(c
• interpreting the forum-selection clause at issue as permissive because the clause contained language that the parties “shall be free to” pursue their rights in Virginia state courts, thus permitting jurisdiction in state court but not prohibiting jurisdiction in federal court
• “A general maxim in interpreting forum-selection clauses is that an agreement conferring jurisdiction in one forum will not be interpreted as excluding jurisdiction elsewhere unless it contains specific language of exclusion.” (internal quotation marks omitted
• discussing varying uses of the word “shall”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).