Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 3/26/2001
Intevep, S.A. Research & Technological Support Establishment v. Sena
Citations
- 41 S.W.3d 391
- 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 1919
- 2001 WL 287039
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- general rule is that matters of remedy and procedure are governed by law of state where action sought to be maintained
- Venezuelan law applied where Venezuelan statute created right of action and provided limitations period
- plaintiff pleading respondeat superior bears the burden of proof
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Whittington, Bridges, Roach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hunt Oil Co. v. LIVE OAK ENERGY, INC.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2010-06-18· cited 15×
- Moonlight Investments, Ltd. v. JohnTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2006-06-15· cited 12×
- Tarrant Regional Water District v. VillanuevaTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2010-12-23· cited 7×
- Chih Shen Chen v. Inteplast Group, Ltd.S.D. Texas· 2014-03-31· cited 2×
- Moonlight Investments, LTD. v. Francis D. JohnTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2006-05-18
- Tarrant Regional Water District v. Tamara VillanuevaTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2010-12-23
- Sam Rayburn Municipal Power Agency v. Ralph J. Gillis, Gillis Borchardt & Barthel LLP, Obain Associates Limited and the Jasper/VPPA Settlement TrustTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2018-07-26
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1985-05-01· cited 7,748×
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court· 1979-10-03· cited 5,187×
- McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court· 1993-09-10· cited 1,797×
- Triton Oil & Gas Corp. v. Marine Contractors and Supply, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1982-11-03· cited 310×
- Baker Hughes, Inc. v. KECO R. & D., INC.Texas Supreme Court· 2000-01-06· cited 177×
- State of California, Department of Mental Hygiene v. CopusTexas Supreme Court· 1958-01-15· cited 141×
- Jennings v. BurgessTexas Supreme Court· 1996-03-07· cited 137×
- Espalin v. Children's Medical Center of DallasTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2000-09-08· cited 126×
- Hollander v. CaponTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-04-15· cited 97×
- International Union United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers Local 119 v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1991-08-06· cited 63×
- Muckelroy v. Richardson Independent School DistrictTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1994-08-16· cited 62×
- Eurocapital Group Ltd. v. Goldman Sachs & Co.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2000-05-04· cited 40×
- Francis v. Herrin Transportation CompanyTexas Supreme Court· 1968-10-02· cited 32×
- Culpepper v. Daniel Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1973-10-11· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.