Intertype Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a delay was “mitigated” when it was caused by “the government’s desire to secure the presence of [a co-defendant] and to try him jointly with each of his alleged co-conspirators.”
• prejudice was “insubstantial” even though defendant suffered damage to his reputation, witnesses’ memories dulled, and two character witnesses for defendant died
• federal court of appeals issued mandamus setting aside a trial judge’s improper dismissal of indictments
• prejudice was “insubstantial” where defendant alleged “general claims of prejudice, such as damage to reputation . . . and the dulling of witnesses’ memories,” and two character witnesses for defendant died
• mandamus vacating order dismissing indictments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).