· 5/8/1933
Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States Ex Rel. Campbell
Citations
- 289 U.S. 385
- 53 S. Ct. 607
- 77 L. Ed. 1273
- 1933 U.S. LEXIS 973
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- It is “elementary” that “to compel an adjudication in a particular way . . . is not the function of the writ.”
- Mandamus cannot be used to correct “[e]rrors of law” in exercise of “essentially judicial” functions just like “errors of fact” may not be thus corrected.
- “The question is not how much better off the complainant would be today if it had paid a lower rate. The question is how much worse off it is because others have paid less.”
- when discrimination and that alone is gist of offense, difference between one rate and another is not the measure of damages suffered by the ship- per
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cardozo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.