Skip to main content
· 5/8/1933

Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States Ex Rel. Campbell

Citations

  • 289 U.S. 385
  • 53 S. Ct. 607
  • 77 L. Ed. 1273
  • 1933 U.S. LEXIS 973

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • It is “elementary” that “to compel an adjudication in a particular way . . . is not the function of the writ.”
  • Mandamus cannot be used to correct “[e]rrors of law” in exercise of “essentially judicial” functions just like “errors of fact” may not be thus corrected.
  • “The question is not how much better off the complainant would be today if it had paid a lower rate. The question is how much worse off it is because others have paid less.”
  • when discrimination and that alone is gist of offense, difference between one rate and another is not the measure of damages suffered by the ship- per

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardozo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.