Skip to main content
· 10/22/1974

Interstate Commerce Commission, and Ethan Allen, Inc., Intervenors v. Maine Central Railroad Company

Citations

  • 505 F.2d 590

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[T]he very institution of suit in the courts by the relevant administrative body represents an exercise of its 'special competence.'\
  • doctrine of primary jurisdiction applies where a claim is originally cognizable in the courts, and comes into play when resolution of the issues under regulatory scheme requires the special competence of an administrative body
  • “[Primary jurisdiction] doctrine can have no application where, as here, the very institution of suit in the courts by the relevant administrative body represents an exercise of its ‘special competence.’”
  • “[T]he very institution of suit in the courts by the applying the doctrine[.]” United States v. Western Pacific. R. relevant administrative body represents an exercise of its Co., 352 U.S. 59, 64 (1956)
  • Where the line’s major shipper, Ethan Allen, Inc., offered to contribute the costs of restoration of a branch line in a similar context. The district court enjoined the abandonment, but in doing so ordered the shipper to pay $52,000 as full restoration costs.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays, Anderson, Mansfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.