Skip to main content
· 1/21/1993

Interstate Battery System of America, Inc. v. Wright

Citations

  • 811 F. Supp. 237
  • 26 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1699
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 668
  • 1993 WL 11068

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that awarding treble damages pursuant to Section 1117(b) serves the purpose of deterring future infringement
  • Court held that licensee that used trademark on batteries bought from a different source than the trademark owner and in violation of a licensing agreement was a counterfeiter.
  • “Ordinarily, the same set of facts enabling a plaintiff to recover under 15 U.S.C. Section 1114 will enable recovery under 15 U.S.C. Section 1125.”
  • Court held that licensee that used trademark on batteries bought from a different source than the trademark owner and in violation of a licensing agreement was a counterfeiter.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kendall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.