Interspiro Usa, Inc., N.K.A. Pharos Protection Usa, Inc. And Pharos Tech Usa, Inc. v. Figgie International Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming fee award where “the central issue whether [defendant] breached the agreement . . . turns on whether the E-Z Flo infringes the ‘145 patent”
• “It is well established that issues cannot be raised for the 19 first time in a reply brief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).