S.D. New York· 1/26/1995
Interpool Ltd. v. Patterson
Citations
- 874 F. Supp. 616
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 908
- 1995 WL 31858
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding dismissal of juror upset over missing planned trip appropriate as he would have adversely affected deliberations
- upholding own decision to excuse a juror on the seventh day of trial, before the close of evidence, when the juror became angry about missing a scheduled trip
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaplan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Phansalkar v. Andersen Weinroth & Co., L.P.Second Circuit· 2003-09-16· cited 89×
- G.K. Alan Assoc., Inc. v. LazzariAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-07-10· cited 66×
- Phansalkar v. Andersen Weinroth & Co.Second Circuit· 2003-09-16· cited 21×
- Design Strategies, Inc. v. DavisS.D. New York· 2005-08-11· cited 19×
- Interpool Ltd. v. PattersonS.D. New York· 1995-06-16· cited 13×
- City of New York v. JAM Consultants, Inc.S.D. New York· 1995-06-16· cited 9×
- Curiale v. CapolinoS.D. New York· 1995-03-31· cited 8×
- Rosenberg v. Salomon, Inc.D. Connecticut· 1997-09-16· cited 5×
- Christiansen v. Wright Medical Technology Inc.N.D. Georgia· 2016-04-05· cited 5×
- Gibbs v. Breed, Abbott & MorganNew York Supreme Court· 1999-06-25· cited 3×
- Saint-Jean v. Emigrant Mortg. Co.E.D. New York· 2018-08-20· cited 1×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court· 1940-12-09· cited 1,397×
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court· 1988-04-27· cited 861×
- Lopez-Medina v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-10-07· cited 486×
- Tucker Anthony Realty Corp. v. SchlesingerSecond Circuit· 1989-11-06· cited 273×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,862 G. A. Thompson & Co., Inc. v. Herbert Partridge, Robert M. Presley, Frank Andrews and C. Thomas MurphyFifth Circuit· 1981-02-09· cited 160×
- United States v. Andrew Jackson Smith, Isaac Hicks, Samuel Smith, James SawyerEleventh Circuit· 1990-12-14· cited 119×
- Ivette Santiago-Negron v. Modesto Castro-Davila, Etc.First Circuit· 1989-02-03· cited 113×
- Auwood v. Harry Brandt Booking Office, Inc.Second Circuit· 1988-06-17· cited 96×
- Maritime Fish Products, Inc. v. World-Wide Fish Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1984-03-15· cited 80×
- Dorina Mateyko, and Raymond Mateyko v. Thomas Felix, Michael Serafin, the City of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 1991-01-23· cited 69×
- Deeper Life Christian Fellowship, Inc. v. Thomas Sobol, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of Education of the State of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1991-10-24· cited 63×
- Geosearch, Inc. v. Howell Petroleum CorporationFifth Circuit· 1987-07-23· cited 35×
- Musico v. Champion Credit Corp.Second Circuit· 1985-06-10· cited 35×
- United States v. Gerald S. SimpsonD.C. Circuit· 1993-05-21· cited 34×
- Bon Temps Agency Ltd. v. GreenfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-06-11· cited 34×
- United States v. GambinoSecond Circuit· 1991-12-10· cited 22×
- Hicks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-10-07· cited 10×
- D'Amico v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-05-18· cited 4×
- Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-10-04· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.