· 2/20/2004
International Union, United Mine Workers v. United States Department of Labor
Citations
- 358 F.3d 40
- 360 U.S. App. D.C. 113
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 2969
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding mandamus review is available when an agency withdraws a proposed rule and the court had exclu- sive jurisdiction to review any promulgated rule
- noting that “[t]wo of the three reasons [the agency] gave . . . would not support its decision, and we do not know – nor are we free to guess – what the agency would have done” had it not entertained those rationales
- “The [agency’s] statement that there was a ‘change in agency priorities,’ without explanation, is not informative in the least[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Garland, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.