Skip to main content
· 2/20/2004

International Union, United Mine Workers v. United States Department of Labor

Citations

  • 358 F.3d 40
  • 360 U.S. App. D.C. 113
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 2969

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding mandamus review is available when an agency withdraws a proposed rule and the court had exclu- sive jurisdiction to review any promulgated rule
  • noting that “[t]wo of the three reasons [the agency] gave . . . would not support its decision, and we do not know – nor are we free to guess – what the agency would have done” had it not entertained those rationales
  • “The [agency’s] statement that there was a ‘change in agency priorities,’ without explanation, is not informative in the least[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Garland, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.