International Union, United Automobile Workers v. Exide Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that arbitration would be a hollow formality if the company was permitted to drastically cut medical coverage for its employees pending arbitration and some of its employees are unable to obtain medical care as a result of the cut.
• entering injunction to avert “substantial risk” that workers would “forego necessary medical treatment or diagnosis because of their inability to pay their share of the costs”
• “I am convinced that irreparable harm exists in this case as a result of the drastic reduction in health insurance benefits … implemented by the company.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).