Skip to main content
· 7/14/2008

International Underwriters AG v. Triple I: International Investments, Inc.

Citations

  • 533 F.3d 1342
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14861
  • 2008 WL 2717182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “despite the overlap between the contracts,” the plaintiff could have brought its claims even if the contract containing the arbitration clause did not exist at all
  • “But here . . . International could have breached its bond commitment and defrauded Triple I even if there had been no escrow agreement at all. Triple I’s claims are not related—with at least some directness—to the performance of duties specified in the escrow agreement.”
  • ‘But here . . . International could have breached its bond commitment and defrauded Triple I even if there had been no escrow agreement at all. Triple I’s claims are not related—with at least some directness— to the performance of duties specified in the escrow agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Fay, Hinkle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.