International Trading Company v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “suspension of liquidation [is] removed when the final results of the administrative review [are] published in the Federal Register”
• finding that “ ‘notice’ of the duty to be paid is, in effect, notice of the removal of suspension”
• explaining that “publication in the Federal Register is a familiar manner of providing notice to parties in anti-dumping proceedings” and “provides an unambiguous and public starting point for the six-month liquidation period”
• selecting the date of Federal Register publication because it would not afford “the government the ability to postpone indefinitely the removal of suspension of liquidation (and thus the date by which liquidation must be completed
• “[Pjublication of the final results in the Federal Register constitutes notice to Customs within the meaning of section 1504(d).”
• “ ‘[NJotice’ of the duty to be paid is, in effect, notice of the removal of suspension.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).