International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., Communications Equipment & Systems Division v. Local 134, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that such a decision cannot be an “order” within the meaning of the APA
• explaining that “when Congress defined ‘order’ in terms of a ‘final disposition,’ it required that ‘final disposition’ to have some determinate consequences for the party to the proceeding”
• “[W]hen Congress defined ‘order’ in terms of a ‘final disposition,’ it required that ‘final disposition’ to have some determinate consequences for the party to the [agency] proceeding.”
• NLRB investigatory proceeding under § 10(k) of National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160(k) (1982), despite formal evidendary hearing and decision, is not an adjudication because resulting decision, “standing alone, binds no one”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).