International Standard Electric Corp. v. Bridas Sociedad Anonima Petrolera, Industrial Y Comercial

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A confirmation proceeding under the Convention is not an original action, it is, rather in the nature of a post-judgment enforcement proceeding.” (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted)
• “[W]e hold that the contested language in article VI(e) of the Convention, ‘... the competent authority of the country under the law of which, [the] award was made’ refers exclusively to procedural and not substantive law .... ” (alteration in original)
• the “competent authority” to entertain a motion 2 Again, because the parties do not dispute this issue, the Court does not include the analysis by which courts determine where an arbitral award was “made” for purposes of the New York Convention. made
• finding Article V(1)(e) “undoubtedly referenced” the arbitral seat

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).