International Order of Job's Daughters v. Lindeburg & Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under the doctrine of issue preclusion, the Ninth Circuit's earlier determination that a name and emblem did not serve as a trademark required cancellation of the registration
• finding sufficient the petitioner’s production and sale of merchandise bearing the registered mark
• finding sufficient the petitioner's production and sale of merchandise bearing the registered mark
• finding a legitimate commercial in- terest in the “longtime production and sale of merchandise with the [mark]” at issue, with “an equal right [to] that of [registrant-approved retailers] to use the [mark]” (empha- sis added)
• “In recent cases, this court has explicitly said that there is no require- ment that damage be proved in order to establish standing or to prevail in a cancellation proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).