International Order of Job's Daughters v. Lindeburg and Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• criticizing Boston Professional because it “transmogrifies this narrow [trademark] protection into a broad monopoly”
• explaining “the choice of federal or state law frequently has no 19 impact on the outcome, leading courts to avoid the issue”
• “[o]ur holding does not mean that a name or emblem could not serve simultaneously as a functional component of a product and a trademark”
• no infringement where unauthorized jewelry maker produced rings and pins bearing fraternal organization’s trademark
• considering an as-applied functionality defense to a trademark-infringement claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).