International Long Term Care, Inc. v. Shalala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “interests of health care providers and Medicare beneficiaries are closely intertwined”
• assessing if plaintiff “might well prevail on the merits after.,. exhaustion]”
• “The administrative process is entitled to a presumption of regularity [absent] persuasive evidence that [plaintiff] is not being treated fairly by the State or federal government.”
• considering harms to beneficiaries and providers to be “closely intertwined”
• “The Court does not perceive any harm to the government in permitting the ALJ to reach promptly the merits of a live controversy rather than forcing him to wait until after plaintiff is financially dysfunctional and the residents have already been moved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).