International Insurance v. Rollprint Packaging Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the insurer did not have to reimburse defense expenses related to an offensive counterclaim
• holding that an insurance policy providing that the insurance company would pay “[a]ll reasonable expenses incurred by the insured at our request” (emphasis omitted
• holding an appellate court may affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment on any grounds supported by the record
• stating that “[i]t is well settled in Illinois that an insured may not recover attorney fees and costs for bringing a declaratory judgment action against an insurer unless there is a showing of vexatious conduct on the part of the insurer”
• holding in the context of an occurrence policy that an “insurer’s duty to defend extends to cases where the complaint contains several theories or causes of action against the insured and only one of the theories is within the policy’s coverage and the others may not be”
• holding in the context of an occurrence policy that an “insurer’s duty to defend extends to cases where the complaint contains several theories or causes of action against the insured and only one of the theories is within the policy’s coverage and the others may not be”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).