International Harvester Co. of America v. Bean

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a Rule 11 motion filed two-and-a-half years after giving notice of intent to file a Rule 11 motion was reasonable and timely
• refusing to impose sanctions on factual allegations made “with a healthy dose of hyperbole” that were not “wholly without evidentiary support”
• declining to stay the adjudication of a bill of costs pending appeal, but staying the enforcement of that bill of costs
• observing, in finding that the requested one-third fee award was reasonable, that “the plaintiffs here are sizable, sophisticated entities capable of reviewing (and objecting to) the proposed fee arrangement”
• observing, in finding that the requested one-third fee award was reasonable, that “the plaintiffs here are sizable, sophisticated entities capable of reviewing (and objecting to) the proposed fee arrangement”
• allowing real-time hookup costs, as well as processing and handling costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).