International Financial Services, Inc. v. Franz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a consequential damages exclusion is not unconscionable when ‘the parties were both merchants and there was no great disparity in their bargaining strength and where the claim is for commercial loss’
• holding that even when there was not evidence of a specific defect which caused the problems, “the cumulative circumstantial evidence [wa]s sufficient to take the inference of causation out of the realm of speculation”
• noting that the parties were both merchants with no great disparity in bargaining strength

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).