International Fidelity Insurance v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting motion to dismiss, finding that the plaintiff was personal staff and thus not an employee, reasoning that “in the present case there are no issues of fact with regard to the question to be resolved on the motion”
• “U]nder the New York doctrine of double recovery, defendants are precluded from bringing claims seeking a second recovery for the same injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).