International Design Concepts, LLC v. Saks Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, outside the class-action context, that the court “need not determine whether intervention as of right under Rule 24(a) is warranted”
• “The assignment of ‘all assets of [AGI]’ is broad enough to encompass all causes of action owned by AGI.”
• “The assignment of ‘all assets of [AGI]’ is broad enough to encompass all causes of action owned by AGI.”
• “I also note that AGI was a defunct entity and would have had little incentive to reserve transactional rights.”
• “With limited exceptions not applicable here, New York permits the assignment of tort claims.”
• “No specific language is required in order to transfer a tort cause of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).