International Counsel Bureau v. U.S. Central Intelligence Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Exemption 3 was properly invoked after court had, under Exemption 1 analysis, “found that the information requested . . . constitute[d] ‘intelligence sources and methods’”
• IRO of the National Clandestine Service of the CIA is proper classification authority to invoke exemptions supporting Glomar response

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).