Skip to main content
· 2/5/2007

International Center for Technology Assessment v. Johanns

Citations

  • 473 F. Supp. 2d 9
  • 37 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20044
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7773
  • 2007 WL 315633

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that new evidence submitted with a reply may be considered as long as the opposing party has had an opportunity to respond

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.