International Café, S.A.L. v. Hard Rock Café International (U.S.A.), Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Paris Convention “only requires ‘national treatment’ ”
• holding that the Paris Convention \only requires `national treatment'\
• applying framework from Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. T. Eaton Co., 234 F.2d 633, 640 (2d Cir. 1956)
• \[T]he rights articulated in the Paris Convention do not exceed the rights conferred by the Lanham Act\
• discussing Steele, 344 U.S. 280, 73 S.Ct. 252
• adopting the Court’s reasoning in Vanity Fair

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).