International Business MacHines Corp. v. Martson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying New York law and holding that the employee choice doctrine is not limited to future benefits and extends to benefits that have already been paid
• “It has long been held that stock award plans . . . whose objectives are to retain talented executives by providing them with a proprietary interest in the growth and performance of the company, are not ‘wages’ under § 190 of the New York Labor Law.”
• “It has long been held that stock award plans . . . whose objectives are to retain talented executives by providing them with a proprietary interest in the growth and performance of the company, are not ‘wages’ under § 190 of the New York Labor Law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).