Skip to main content
· 7/2/1991

International Business MacHines Corp. v. Comdisco, Inc.

Citations

  • 602 A.2d 74
  • 1991 Del. Ch. LEXIS 123
  • 1991 WL 297094

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that exclusive and concurrent jurisdiction are used different ways by different commentators
  • “If there is a full, complete, practical and efficient remedy at law, this Court is without jurisdiction to hear the matter”
  • “Damage remedies exist to compensate for loss engendered by torts or contract breaches which have already occurred.”
  • “Equitable jurisdiction must be determined from the face of the complaint as of the time of filing, with all material factual allegations viewed as true.”
  • “[J]udges in the Delaware Court of Chancery are obligated to decide whether a matter comes within the equitable jurisdiction of this Court regardless of whether the issue has been raised by the parties.”
  • “[U]nlike many jurisdictions, judges in the Delaware Court of Chancery are obligated to decide whether a matter comes within the equitable jurisdiction of this Court regardless of whether the issue has been raised by the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chandler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.