International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. Szoke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that evidence of extensive licensing supported conclusion that products were related
• explaining that design features not inherent or specifically stated in the application are irrelevant
• finding extensive licensing of mark MONOPOLY for real estate game relevant evidence of relatedness of goods
• finding no error in the Board’s finding that it is common knowledge that famous marks are frequently used on diverse and “novelty” items
• affirming Board decision sustaining opposition where opposer showed the applicant’s use of the mark on T-shirts would likely cause confusion with opposer’s mark, where the registration in- cluded T-shirts, dresses, skirts, coats, scarves, etc.
• relevant goods are those recited in the application, notwithstanding actual or intended use of the mark (continued...

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).